Tag Archive: Common Core State Standards Initiative

How to Get Students to Really Listen, Summarize/Paraphrase, and Respond to Peers

If you’re noticing a large gap between your students’ speaking skills and the ambitious Speaking and Listening Standards within the Common Core State Standards (CCSS), you’re not alone: many teachers that I talk to share how difficult it is to have discussions or debates in which students actually listen to one another and respond.

Mentioning isn’t good enough

In even the best secondary discussions, students will acknowledge that they are part of a conversation (e.g., “Going off of what Jean-Paul said, I think…,” “Aron, in regards to your point, this is what I think…”), but they won’t actually show that they understood what the other person said. They are engaging in assumicide: I assume I understand what you said, and now I’m going to respond to it. In the video below, the first student clip is an example of that kind of discussion move, which I’ll call mentioning. (Click here for the youtube link.)

Now, clearly, this is way better than the (much more common) phenomenon of students simply waiting their turn to spout their two cents at the teacher. In such scenarios, no one cares what other students say: they are simply warding off boredom by participating, or they are meeting the teacher’s expectation for participation–but they are not actually engaging with ideas.

To put it in CCSS terms, take a look at SL.9-10.1d:

Review the key ideas expressed and demonstrate understanding of multiple perspectives through reflection and paraphrasing.

This is more than mentioning: it is taking the time to summarize or paraphrase what someone else said. Only after this has happened can we venture into adding something new, disagreeing with evidence, questioning, or perhaps revising our original stance in light of a stellar point.

Using debate to hone in on this skill

My students recently read and annotated several books from The Odyssey. This is the first extended complex text that they are required to read as freshmen, and I have them read it for the sake of accruing textual evidence in response to this question: Is Odysseus a hero or a villain?

In reading, my target anchor standard here is R.CCR.1; in writing, I’m aiming for W.CCR.1 because at the end of their reading I will guide students in using their evidence to construct their first argumentative essay; and, in speaking and listening, I’m aiming at SL.CCR.1.

For a written overview of my debate, check out these notes. In them, you’ll find my pre-debate, debate, and post-debate activities, and I also include a rubric for assessing the speaking and listening standards covered in this activity.

For a video overview, enjoy the segment below (or click here for the link).

Important!

If you haven’t done so already, please join us. It’s free! Click here and begin receiving Common Core anchor standards articles like this one in your inbox every time they’re posted.

Beyond the Common Core Standards

As I mentioned in the first post on Teaching the Core, I’ve never been a fan of teaching standards; in fact, “standards” is a word that I happily deleted from the Tagxedo word cloud that I created out of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) ELA & Literacy document. A ton of things attracted me to becoming a teacher, but ensuring that my courses adhered to a list of standards was never one of those things.

In fact, the reason I set out to blog through the CCSS is because they affirm some things that I learned during my glorious, standards-ignoring days as a beginning teacher. (For more about what initially drew me to pay attention to the CCSS, read this post.)

But there’s so much more to teaching

Even though I think the CCSS represent common sense, there is so much more to teaching than academics. Below, you’ll find some of the “burning questions” that I’d like to eventually explore on this blog:

  • What, essentially, are my courses about? What is my objective for any given term with any given set of students?
    • In this post, I discuss a class purpose that aims at answering these questions.
  • How does a student’s time in my class prepare them to flourish for a lifetime?
  • What is my mission as a teacher?
  • How can I develop character in my students?
  • How can I have the greatest positive impact possible as a public school teacher?
  • Are “21st Century Skills” really anything more than reading, writing, thinking, and being a person of character?

What “beyond the standards” topics are important to you?

Leave a comment to get the discussion started.

Common Core R.CCR.3 Explained

R.CCR.3–unabbreviated, that’s the third college/career readiness anchor standard within the reading strand of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for ELA / Literacy–reads as follows:

Analyze how and why individuals, events, and ideas develop and interact over the course of a text.

Within this standard, I see a lot of questions we could ask students to get them engaged with this skill, but focusing on three should provide the background knowledge necessary to get started.

R.CCR.3 Common Core State Standards in reading

1. How does an individual, event, or idea develop over the course of a text?

Okay, so there are actually three questions within this question alone. However, since the development of ideas is covered pretty thoroughly in R.CCR.2, let’s look at examples of how an individual and an event develops over the course of a text.

For the development of an individual, let’s consider Okonkwo in Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart. This one is tricky because, at first glance, it appears that Okonkwo begins and ends the novel as a man driven by his fear of appearing weak. On closer inspection, however, it’s clear that Oknonkwo does change throughout his life: at one point, his initial romance with Ekwefi gives us a glimpse of a younger, freer Okonkwo; after killing Ikemefuna, Okonkwo grapples with his weakness in getting over what he has done; and so on.

For the development of an event, let’s consider the Battle of the Cowshed in George Orwell’s Animal Farm. Throughout the novel, Squealer repeatedly revises this event: when the narrator tells of it, Snowball is heroic; over the course of Squealer’s revisions, Snowball transforms into a coward and, finally, into a traitor. In this example, an event develops over time through several revisionist speeches from Squealer. By the way, this is a great tie-in to other instances in history where governments (or authors!) have created revisionist narratives.

2. How do individuals, events, or ideas interact over the course of a text?

Fahrenheit 451

There are lots of great discussions and questions we can get to when we consider how individuals, events, and ideas interact throughout a complex text.

For an example of an analysis using this kind of questioning, consider how the idea of his own happiness interacts with Montag over the course of Fahrenheit 451. This idea is planted in Montag’s consciousness by the innocent Clarisse: “Are you happy?” she asks. Yet, simple though it may seem, this idea of his own happiness is alarming to Montag, and one could argue that this idea is the most influential idea in the book and has the most to do with the shaping of the events of the story.

3. Why does an individual, event, or idea develop and/or interact over the course of a text?

One of my colleagues (a math teacher) is famous amongst the students of our school for always responding to their statements with simple questions like “Why?” or simple statements like “Explain.” If you want to get students thinking deeply, ask why.

For example, let’s say my freshmen students are discussing why individuals develop, and we’re reading Things Fall Apart. I could ask them what kind of an individual Okonkwo is, and they tell me, “Well, he’s obsessed with being strong and successful.”

“Why?”

“Um, because his dad was weak. He was a humiliation to Okonkwo.”

“Okay, why?”

“Because Umuofian society values strength.”

“Explain that with evidence.”

“Well, for example, a man is judged based on his number of titles, his number of wives, and his number of barns. All of these are essentially based on his success as a farmer, and this is largely based on his work ethic. For an additional example, consider that men have an exalted position in the society, whereas women are often treated like objects.”

Using these kinds of discussions (along with the use of simple note cards to ensure you’re calling on more than just your most vocal students), you can get kids doing the skills within R.CCR.3–and enjoying it.

Older posts «